Contempt of Court Ordinance,
Ordinance X of 1998
An ordinance to regulate the exercise
of the powers of courts to punish for contempt of court
WHEREAS clause (3) of Article 204 of the Constitution of the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan provides that the exercise of the power conferred on
courts to punish for contempt may be regulated by laws:
AND WHEREAS the National Assembly is not in session and the president is
satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary to take immediate
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article
89 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the President is
pleased to make and promulgate the following ordinance:-
- Short title and commencement.-
- This Ordinance may be called the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 1998.
- It extends to the whole of Pakistan.
- It shall come into force at once.
In this Ordinance,-
- 'Academic critique' means an article written by a lawyer or a person
holding an academic post containing an analysis of a judgment on the basis of
legal criteria or desiderata;
- 'Civil contempt' means the wilful flouting or
disregard of -
- an order, whether interim or final, a judgment or decree of
- a writ or order issued by a court in the exercise of its
- an undertaking given to, and recorded by, a
court; (iv) the process of a court;
- 'Criminal contempt' means the doing of
any act with intent to, or having the effect of, obstructing the administration
- 'Judicial contempt' means the scandalisation of a court and
includes personalised criticism of a judge while holding office;
means a notice other than a show-cause notice issued by a court;
proceedings' means proceedings which have been instituted in a court of law
until finally decided after exhausting all appeals, revisions or reviews
provided by law or until the period of limitation therefore has expired;
provided that the pendency of an execution application shall not detract form
the finality of the proceedings.
- 'Personalised criticism' means a criticism
of a judge or a judgment in which improper motives are imputed; and
- 'Superior court' means the Supreme Court or a High Court.
- Every superior court shall have the power to punish a
contempt committed in relation to it.
- Subject to sub-section (3), every
High Court shall have the power to punish a contempt committed in relation to
any court subordinate to it.
- No High Court shall proceed in cases in which
an alleged contempt is punishable by a subordinate court under the Pakistan
Penal Code (Act No. XLV of 1860).
- Subject to
sub-section(2), any person who commits contempt of court shall be punished with
imprisonment which may extend to six months simple imprisonment, or with fine
which may extend to one hundred thousand rupees, or with both.
- A person
accused of having committed contempt of court may, at any stage, submit an
apology and the court, it satisfied that it is bona fide, may discharge him or
remit his sentence. Explanation.- The fact that an accused person genuinely
believes that he has not committed contempt and enters a defence shall not
detract from the bona fides of an apology.
- In the case of a contempt having
been committed, or alleged to have been committed, by a company, the
responsibility therefore shall extend to the persons in the company, directly
or indirectly, responsible for the same, who shall also be liable to be
- Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment,
no court shall have the power to pass any order of punishment for or in
relation to any act of contempt save and except in accordance with sub-section
- Criminal contempt when committed.-
- A criminal contempt shall be
deemed to have been committed if a person-
- attempts to influence a witness,
or proposed witness, either by intimidation or improper inducement, not to give
evidence, or not to tell the truth in any legal proceeding;
- offers an
improper inducement, or attempts to intimidate a judge, in order to secure a
favorable verdict in any legal proceedings;
- commits any other act with
intent to divert the course of justice;
- Nothing contained in sub-section
(1) shall prejudice any other criminal proceedings which may be initiated
against any such person as is mentioned therein.
- Cognisance of criminal
- In the case of a criminal contempt a superior court may take
- suo motu, or
- on the initiative of any person connected with
the proceedings in which the alleged contempt has been committed, or
the application of the law officer of a provincial or the federal government.
- Fair reporting.-
- Subject to sub-section(2), the publication of a
substantially accurate account of what has transpired in a court, or of legal
proceedings, shall not constitute contempt of court.
- The court may, for
reasons to be recorded in writing, in the interest of justice, prohibit the
publication of information pertaining to legal proceedings.
- Subject to the provisions of this Ordinance, personalised
criticism of a specific judge, or judges, may constitute judicial contempt save
and except if made in good faith and in temperate language in a complaint
- to the administrative superior of a judge of a subordinate court; or
- to a provincial government; or
- to the Chief Justice of a High Court; or
- to the Supreme Court; or
- to the Supreme Judicial Council; or
- to the
federal government for examination and being forwarded to the Supreme Judicial
- Nothing contained in sub-section (1) is intended to deprive a
judge of the right to file a suit for defamation.
- Academic criticism.-
An academic critique of a judgment in a case of public importance shall not
constitute contempt notwithstanding the fact that an appeal maybe pending if:-
- it is phrased in temperate language;
- it is not made by or on behalf of
a party, or by an advocate appearing in the case; and
- does not pertain to
a pending criminal case,or disciplinary proceedings against a public servant,
or a case involving disqualification of a member of the Majlis-e-Shoora
(parliament) or a Provincial Assembly.
- Criticism of judgments.-
No criticism of a judgment in a case which has been finally decided and is no
longer pending shall constitute contempt, no matter how far reaching or
outspoken in nature it may be, if it is phrased in temperate language and does
not impute improper motives to the judge.
- Judicial contempt.-
- A superior court may only take action in a case of judicial contempt on its own
- Subject to sub-section (1) any person may lay information
relating to the commission of an alleged judicial contempt before a superior
court, but such information shall not be registered as a case (although it may
be placed in the case file) and nor shall any such person have the right of
audience before the court.
- Any person laying false information relating to
the commission of an alleged judicial contempt shall himself be liable to be
proceeded against for contempt of court.
- Judicial contempt proceedings
initiated by a judge, or relating to a judge, shall not be heard by the said
judge, but shall (unless he is himself the Chief Justice) be referred to the
Chief Justice, who may hear the same personally or refer it to some other
judge, and, in a case in which the judge himself is the Chief Justice, shall be
referred to the senior most judge available for disposal similarly.
proceedings for judicial contempt shall be initiated after the expiry of one
- Civil contempt.-
- Proceedings for civil contempt may be initiated
suo motu or at the instance of an aggrieved party.
- The provisions contained
herein are intended to be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the power
of the court under any other law for the time being in force to enforce
compliance of its orders, judgments or decrees.
- Procedure in cases of
contempt in the face of the court.-
- In the case of a contempt committed in
the face of the court, if the accused, persists in disorderly conduct, the
court may direct that he leaves the court room, and, failing compliance, may
further direct that he be physically removed from the court room.
- In all
cases of contempt in the face of the court, the judge shall pass an order in
open court recording separately what was said or done by the accused person and
what was observed by the judge and shall, if he is not the Chief Justice, refer
the matter to the Chief Justice, and, if he is the Chief Justice, to the senior
most available judge of a the court, who shall either hear and decide the
matter himself or refer it to some other judge for disposal; Provided that it
shall not be necessary for the matter to be so referred if the accused person
requests in writing that it be decided by the judge before whom the contempt,
or alleged contempt, was committed.
- In the ensuing proceedings for contempt
it shall not be necessary for the judge in whose presence the alleged contempt
was committed to appear as a witness and the statement of events recorded by
him under sub-section (2) may be treated as evidence; Provided that the judge
hearing the case may seek further comments from the said judge, or make such
further enquiry (including the calling of witnesses on his own motion) as he
- Parliamentary speech.-
Nothing contained in this Ordinance or
any other law is intended to stifle discussion in the Majlis-e-Shoora
(parliament) or a Provincial Assembly on any matter of public importance
without criticism of the conduct of a judge in the discharge of his duties.
- Expunged material.-
No material which has been expunged from the record under
the orders of - (i) a court of competent jurisdiction; or (ii) the presiding
officer of the Senate, the National Assembly or a Provincial Assembly, shall be
admissible in evidence.
- Innocent publication.-
No person shall be guilty of
contempt of court for making any statement, or publishing any material,
pertaining to any matter which forms the subject of pending proceedings,if he
was not aware of the pendency thereof.
- Protected statements.-
proceedings for contempt of court shall lie in relation to the following:-
- Observations made by a higher or appellate court in a judicial order or
- remarks made in an administrative capacity by any authority in
the course of official business, including those in connection with a
disciplinary inquiry or in an inspection note or a character roll or
confidential report; and
- a true statement regarding the conduct of a
judge in a matter not connected with the performance of his judicial functions.
- Amicus briefs.-
- In any case pending in a superior court in which issues
of public importance are involved, it shall be open to persons or organisations
other than the parties to the litigation to file, with the permission of the
court, amicus briefs confined to the legal issues arising in the case and the
said briefs may contain such submissions as are legally relevant and do not
contravene the provisions of this Ordinance.
- Permission to file amicus
briefs may be granted without notice subject to the condition that copies
thereof shall be supplied to the parties to the case but the grant of such a
permission shall not entitle the person or the organisation concerned to a
right of audience, or appeal, and nor shall the court be bound to discuss such
submissions in the judgment.
- The provisions of this section shall not
affect the power of the court to request an advocate to appear as amicus
- Save as expressly provided to the contrary,
proceedings in cases of contempt shall be commenced by the issuance of a
notice, or a show-cause notice, at the discretion of the court.
- In the case
of a notice, the alleged contemner may enter appearance in person or through an
advocate, and, in the case of a show-cause notice, shall appear personally;
Provided that the court may at any time exempt the alleged contemner from
- If, after giving the alleged contemner an opportunity
of a preliminary hearing, the court is prima facie satisfied that the interest
of justice so requires, it shall fix a date for framing a charge in open court
and proceed to decide the matter either on that date, or on a subsequent date
or dates, on the basis of affidavits, or after recording evidence; Provided
that the alleged contemner shall not, if he so requests, be denied the right of
cross examination in relation to any affidavit used in evidence against him.
- Substantial detriment.-
- No person shall be found guilty of contempt of
court, or punished accordingly, unless the court is satisfied that the contempt
is one which is substantially detrimental to the administration of justice.
- Explanation.- (1) A serious discussion of substantive issues of public
importance without intent to influence a legal proceeding which may
incidentally be pending will not constitute contempt of court.
- In the event
of a person being found not guilty of contempt by reason of sub-section (1),
the court may pass an order deprecating the conduct, or actions, of the person
accused of having committed contempt.
- Notwithstanding anything contained in
this Ordinance, truth shall be a valid defence in cases of contempt of court.
- Orders passed by a superior court in cases of contempt shall
be appealable in the following manner:-
- In the case of an order passed by a
single judge of a High Court, an intra-court appeal shall lie to a bench of two
or more judges;
- in a case in which the original order has been passed by a
division or large bench of a High Court, an appeal as of right shall lie to the
Supreme Court; and
- in the case of an original order passed by a bench of
the Supreme Court, an intra-court appeal shall lie to a larger bench of the
- The appellate court may suspend the impugned order pending disposal
of the appeal.
- The period of filing an appeal shall be thirty days.
- Ordinance to be exhaustive.-
Save as, and to the extent expressly provided in
this Ordinance, no act or statement of any person shall constitute contempt of
court or be punishable therefor.
The Contempt of Court Act, 1976
(LXIV of 1976) is hereby repealed.
(MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR) PRESIDENT